Saturday May 25, 2013

QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.






Over to you, DoL

George Vanderwolf gave an effective, easy-to-understand presentation last week at the Lillooet Watershed Planning Committee’s meeting on a gravity-fed water option. He is a well-known, respected resident and the Watershed Committee could not have selected a better representative to make its case.

We lack the technical knowledge to judge the merits of the option presented by the Watershed Committee. We do know the District of Lillooet’s plan has been prepared/reviewed and/or approved by an engineering firm which designs community water systems, Interior Health, the Union of BC Municipalities and the federal and provincial governments. The plan presented by the Watershed Planning Committee has not been subjected to that same scrutiny, nor are we certain it would qualify for the unprecedented $10 million in water project funding already secured by the District of Lillooet.

It appeared last week that Mr. Vanderwolf was preaching to the converted, to the constituency that has always supported the gravity option.

However, we suspect that anyone who walked into that meeting who had an open mind and was seeking more information would certainly leave with new questions and probably some doubts about whether the District conducted a proper analysis of the feasibility of the gravity-fed water option.

The District believes it has selected the best option to guarantee a safe and sustainable water supply for our community. But once again, it has done a poor job of communicating with Lillooet residents.

Did council and administration decide that the results of the last election vindicated their position on water? Did they think that, having secured approval from all the appropriate agencies, they no longer needed to keep the community updated? With all the communication resources at its disposal, the District has still not explained to the community as a whole whether it did an in-depth examination of the gravity-fed alternative and on what basis it rejected that option.

We believe the District is obliged to provide that explanation now – not only to answer taxpayers’ concerns, but to ensure Lillooet’s already frayed civic fabric is not torn again.

W.F.


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Bridge River Lillooet News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertisers | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?